.svg)
In a landmark verdict that threatens to ignite a diplomatic and political firestorm in Westminster, Tulip Siddiq, the Labour MP for Hampstead and Highgate, has been sentenced to two years in prison by a court in Bangladesh.
The conviction, handed down on Monday by the Dhaka Special Judge’s Court, finds Siddiq guilty of corruption regarding a controversial government land allocation. The case also saw her aunt, ousted former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, sentenced to five years, and her mother, Sheikh Rehana, sentenced to seven years.
Siddiq, who has strongly denied the charges as "politically motivated," was tried in absentia. The verdict has plunged Sir Keir Starmer’s government into a fresh ethical crisis, with opposition figures already questioning the sustainability of Siddiq’s position in Parliament.
The Verdict: "Abuse of Power"
Judge Rabiul Alam of the Special Judge's Court in Dhaka delivered the verdict, ruling that the accused were involved in the corrupt allocation of plots in the Purbachal New Town project, a suburb of the capital.
The court found that Siddiq, 42, had "corruptly influenced" her aunt, then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, to secure a high-value plot of land for her family. The prosecution, led by Khan Mohammed Mainul Hasan, argued that the allocation was a gross misuse of state resources. While prosecutors had sought life imprisonment, the court settled on custodial sentences and fines equivalent to £620 for each convict.
Read Also: Tulip can't even get her mother; even friends either
"This was a misuse of power by the highest office for familial gain," the court stated in its summary.
Siddiq’s Defence: "Collateral Damage"
Tulip Siddiq has maintained her innocence throughout the proceedings. Her legal team has previously described the trial as a "farce" and a "political smear" orchestrated by the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, which replaced Sheikh Hasina’s regime following the violent uprising in August 2024.
Siddiq has argued she is a British citizen and not subject to the jurisdiction of the Bangladeshi court in this manner, asserting she has become "collateral damage" in the vendetta against her family.
The MP had already resigned from her ministerial role as Economic Secretary to the Treasury earlier this year, citing that the investigation into her financial links to the Hasina regime had become a "distraction" from the government's work. However, she remains a sitting MP.
Daily Dazzling Dawn Analysis: A New Crisis on Starmer’s Doorstep
The conviction of Tulip Siddiq is more than a personal tragedy for the Hampstead and Highgate MP; it is a ticking time bomb for Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Siddiq is not just a backbencher; she is one of the most influential British-Bangladeshi politicians in history and a close ally of the Prime Minister. Their relationship is both political and geographic—Starmer’s Holborn and St Pancras constituency borders Siddiq’s seat. They have campaigned together for years, and she was seen as a rising star in his initial frontbench team.
The Political Fallout:
While the UK has no extradition treaty with Bangladesh, and British courts rarely enforce political convictions from abroad, the optics are damaging. The Conservatives will likely seize on this, asking how the Prime Minister can support an MP with a standing criminal conviction for corruption, regardless of the jurisdiction.
If Starmer defends her, he risks appearing soft on ethics. If he suspends the whip, he validates a trial that many international observers view as a political show trial by the interim Bangladeshi government.
This verdict forces Starmer to navigate a minefield: protecting a loyal ally and a key figure in the BAME community versus upholding the "highest standards of integrity" he promised the electorate.
Legal Expert Opinion: The Battle of Interpretations
To understand the legal ramifications, The Daily Dazzling Dawn spoke to two specialist barristers with opposing views on the validity and impact of this verdict.
"A Mockery of Justice"
Barrister Salah Uddin Sumon, a legal specialist in constitutional law, argues the conviction is legally flawed and unenforceable in the UK.
"This verdict is a textbook example of a miscarriage of justice. Ms Siddiq was tried in absentia without proper legal representation or the ability to cross-examine witnesses. The interim government in Dhaka is using the judiciary to settle political scores with Sheikh Hasina’s family. Under UK law, a conviction obtained in flagrant violation of natural justice principles—specifically the right to a fair trial—carries no weight. There is no legal mechanism to force her resignation based on a politically motivated judgment from a foreign court."
"Integrity Has No Borders"
Barrister Md Iqbal Hossain, a senior legal consultant, believes the moral weight of the verdict cannot be ignored.
"While the technicalities of extradition are one thing, the ethical standards of a British MP are another. The court in Dhaka has examined evidence regarding the Purbachal land deal and found that undue influence was used to acquire public assets. Corruption is a global issue. If a British MP is found guilty of financial impropriety by a recognized court, hiding behind 'political motivation' is not a sufficient defence. To maintain public trust, she faces immense pressure to step down. A conviction for corruption involves moral turpitude that is incompatible with public office."
Will She Be Forced to Resign?
The Law:
Under the Recall of MPs Act 2015, a petition to remove an MP is triggered if they are sentenced to a prison term of more than 12 months. However, this legislation was drafted with UK courts in mind.
Read Also: Tulip bloom again?
A foreign conviction does not automatically trigger disqualification. For Siddiq to lose her seat, the House of Commons Committee on Standards would likely need to launch its own investigation and find that her conduct—regardless of the Bangladeshi verdict—breached the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament significantly enough to warrant suspension.
The Norm:
Historically, MPs convicted in foreign courts (such as regarding protests or activism) have not been expelled. However, a conviction for financial corruption is different. The pressure will now be on the Labour Party to decide if she can remain a Labour MP while a two-year prison sentence hangs over her head in Dhaka.
The Road Ahead
With Sheikh Hasina already facing a 21-year sentence from previous cases and now a death sentence looming from others, the legal net around the family is tightening. For Tulip Siddiq, the battle has now moved from the courtrooms of Dhaka to the court of public opinion in London.
Community Reaction: A Diaspora Divided
The verdict has sent shockwaves through the British Bangladeshi community, exposing deep political fault lines across East London. For supporters of the Awami League, the sentencing is viewed as a "vindictive witch-hunt" targeting the Sheikh family legacy, with many rallying behind Siddiq as a victim of Dhaka’s shifting power dynamics. Conversely, critics of the ousted regime have welcomed the judgment as a necessary step toward accountability, arguing that status in Westminster should offer no immunity against allegations of financial impropriety in Bangladesh. From restaurants to community WhatsApp groups, the debate is fierce, with growing concern that this high-profile conviction could cast a shadow over the diaspora’s hard-won political achievements in the UK.
